superborb: (Default)
I'm going camping for the next week (Grand Tetons!), but I've been contemplating this for the last two weeks and maybe posting about it will either: make me stop spinning my wheels OR subsequent discussion will clarify my thoughts to a more interesting place. (Hm, though replies will be slow? May come next week?) So a bit of an X things make a post...
 
Anyway, context: I've been reading DCU fic for the last couple weeks; I was never in the fandom, but I had read fic sporadically in the past from reclists/pinboard.
 
1. I initially complained on mastodon that it was really hard to find fic on AO3; that sorting by bookmarks/kudos was useless, but pinboard (largely imported from delicious for the pre-AO3 stuff) generated many recs, at the cost of being less systematic than going through AO3. I really do feel like fandom lost something when delicious went down; bookmarks as a way to find fic is the best way I've used to backread the best of a fandom when you're not in it (either time separated or ...motivation separated). It just has the best discoverability in that situation. And AO3 bookmarks don't have the flexible tagging and pinboard isn't free so never got as widely adopted. 
 
2. I've always been interested in fandoms that have existed for a long time, and how they change over that time. Part of the difference between the post and pre AO3 stuff is just that once a fandom has gone on long enough, often characterizations calcify into fanon tropes. (That process may be accelerated by AO3's centralization.) But because of that noticeable cutoff, very anecdotally, it surprised me how different the fic felt. The long tropey epics weren't as visible as they are on AO3 (because they tend to pick up kudos/bookmarks vs only show up once per user on pinboard? or maybe there really are just more of them). 
 
3. I also noted on mastodon that I was surprised because the proportion of fic that made it (from LJ) in /some/ form is much, much higher than in anime fandom from a similar time period. Some combination of AO3 originating in / having earlier adoption in western media fandoms and other fandom cultural practices...? The fic websites also seem more likely to have been thoroughly crawled by web archive. I think this is a difference for all the old big Western media fandoms I've encountered, where there'll be things like the ficfinder comms that have alternate links or it'll be easy to track down the author on fanlore. (Though for even earlier anime and Western media fandoms, I think they're both really hard to track down old best-of recs in.) 
 
4. It was interesting how qualitatively different it felt to try and backread the (LJ era) fics in DCU now vs other big Western media fandoms a decade ago; I was never in e.g. SGA or The Sentinel, but somehow I remember it feeling easier to look for and find recs for them? Maybe it was just that the platforms hadn't changed yet, so linkrot wasn't as bad. Or maybe it was that people knew they'd have to curate recs to be able to find stuff themselves, and those curations are harder to find in the present day. I guess it could also be intrinsic to the fandom: DCU being a more scattered fandom or a smaller one than the juggernauts.
 
Now, to pack! 
superborb: (Default)
As I did not manage in the intervening year and a half to update my DW tags to usability, the referenced post is here.

I was going through a periodic phase of Intense Nostalgia, and I wondered if I might end run it by BLOGGING MY FEELINGS. As one does. Also, clear out a bunch of thoughts that had been gathering in the last year and a half that vaguely fall under this theme. X things make a post and all.

1. Back in the LJ days, someone (I have remembered this as [personal profile] troisroyaumes, but no search brings it up, so I can't say for sure) had posted about a term for nostalgia for a time you're going through right now. At the time, I was soon to graduate high school, so I was extremely ready to embrace this concept. After all, I would definitely miss high school, right? Fandom though, didn't seem to have an ending point; we'd connected through the internet and the internet was still there. (Cue the slow demise of LJ.)

I have no solid hypotheses for why I'm so intensely nostalgic over this particular era of fandom, when I have only mild nostalgia for high school or college.

Hypothesis A: Such a huge percentage of people disappeared forever, with no functioning forwarding address, so I continually think about people without the ability to send a quick 'hi'.

Hypothesis B: Fandom has changed so much and the slice of fandom I occupied so tiny that I feel nostalgia because that space has disappeared forever; you're meant to move on from schooling but I didn't think I'd have to move on from that experience of fandom until it was too late.

Hypothesis C: It's lower consequence than feeling nostalgia over the could-have-beens in schooling, and this is all displacement of my real feelings over something else. (AKA grad school damage that warped my priorities to define success in a particular way that I haven't met.)

2. Last year, I tweeted that I had become the person I wanted to be as a teen. The exact tweets were:
it's not that every ttfeb has been like ~insightful~, but it's definitely made me realize that in many ways, i have become the (fandom) person i wanted to be as a teen and had no idea how to become.
how did people have such interesting things to say? where did they get their insights? -- as a teen i yearned for that.
perhaps the gap is most apparent to me bc it felt so sudden, as i did a lot of development away from fandom, and came back and had Things To Say.
who do i yearn to be now, that i might become in ten years? more erudite? more persuasive? deeper knowledge or broader knowledge?

But I know the (fandom) development I'd want in ten years: I want to be a better writer. It's always been my weakest point academically, propped up by being assessed in conjunction with critical reading. I don't have the feeling for how the gradient works in writing, how to assess what is the direction towards 'better'. Deeper knowledge, broader knowledge, the way to improve has been trained in me through years of school optimized for exactly that.

3. I was the poster session kind of good at people. Maybe that's why LJ and now DW appeal to me: I like to present my topic and then have little conversations after it. But spanning the gap from the poster session to a 1:1 conversation -- I find that so difficult. And so I've been unable to really use Discord to chat with people and keep in touch without twitter/tumblr.

4. Fandom had always been a place for inter-generational friendships. But I wonder now at The Youth discussing aging out of fandom if a cause is the cringe of growing up and looking back at actions they'd taken as kids getting associated with being in fandom at the time. And then that barrier gets enforced with thinking it suspect that adults like the same things teens do. (On the one hand, I truly benefitted from those casual interactions with adults as a teen. On the other, current fandom is really... not a place where it's easy to mix like that anymore.)

5. This is a vaguely formed hypothesis: I was thinking about small fandoms and how there's (often, not always) a better sense of community; is some of the more adamant fracturing of large fandoms (e.g. character bashing) an action taken to deliberately create a small fandom niche within a large fandom?
superborb: (Default)
I have been using mastodon lately in lieu of twitter (I'm @superborb@federatedfandom.net), and I have some preliminary thoughts. I also am having FEELINGS about another platform disintegrating, which are mostly like, me wanting to get them out somewhere.

Read more... )
superborb: (Default)
I briefly discussed some of this on twitter previously, but wanted to more long-form discuss, which of course means moving to DW!! Anyway, these are somewhat scattered thoughts, but putting it together + talking with people about it always clarifies my thoughts.

I like a lot of things about Discord! I wrote previously that it fannishly descended from the instant messaging programs of yore, and has similar dynamics as places with large group chats to mingle and meet friends and small ones to settle friendships. When it goes well, those are indeed both niches that I personally find essential to a ~balanced social media diet~.

The difference is as fandom increasingly moves to Discord-only, its weakness as a primary fannish platform becomes more obvious to me. There's two main problems IMO: 1) no way to call out important / top level discussion aka curation; 2) difficulty in propagating social norms and thus community feeling. There is also the 3) "difficulty in FINDING a server" problem, but I think that is far less structural.

1: Beyond the obvious difficulty in backreading a busy server, it's really hard to point out a specific message as important without resorting to dedicated 'low traffic' channels or such. Partially, this is a me-problem, as I am completionist... But I also think this means Discord requires an alternate host to serve as repository for longer or more polished thoughts. OR a server with a very strict and different culture than I've usually observed. I wonder if that would be possible with a long slowmode? (For non-Discord users, slowmode means a user must wait a mod-defined amount of time before sending another message, though edits are allowed on previous messages.) In contentious debate, having a slowmode set really helped cool tempers and force a more reasoned argument, but I've never seen it used to force longer thoughts.

Also, "curate your feed" became so central on tumblr, and caused problems on twitter, with its inferior curation tools, that I wondered how Discord-based fandom would deal with it. On Discord, there are even fewer tools to curate other than leaving a group, because everything is intrinsically shaped like a conversation and even blocking people, it's ...shaped like a conversation you're just ignoring one person in?

2: Within a server, you're essentially all in one room with EVERYONE AT THE SAME TIME. And this might work if the group can establish shared social mores, but that's non-trivial to do. One way that LJ had shared norms propagate is through lurking before having to participate; you can still do that, but it's much less interesting to lurk a conversation than polished (or not) public posts. Sure, messaging is probably a native way to communicate for a lot of people in their 20s and 30s, but the norms of that messaging are wildly different (and have changed over time! I was reading an AIM log from LJ days and wow do I message differently now!)

This seems minor, until you have a disagreement and those norms suddenly clash over how you're supposed to resolve a conflict in the first place! One norm I've encountered often is the 'doubling down on shared opinions to distinguish in and out group', which I fundamentally disagree with. However, if you're trying to resolve a conflict and one party is used to seeing conflict as an in vs out group disagreement (and therefore looking for a common opinion) and the other is offended by viewing the world that way, this is not a path to success. Of course, I think the problem of 'how to disagree and still be in community' is at the heart of being a community in the first place, and not a Discord-specific problem.

On the less outright conflict front though, every community has people you like or dislike to varying degrees, and I've discovered that in a Discord server, when you're sharing a space that can't be easily filtered, perceived norms-violations irritate me way more than in any other platform or real life situation I've ever encountered. I don't know if other people feel that way, but I've had enough discussions around it that I think it's relatively common, and more common on Discord than elsewhere. It's the lack of ability to socially get away, perhaps, combined with Discord being a difficult place to transmit those norms?

3: It is unfortunately a really opaque barrier to finding servers; getting access to comms, even if it required an essay, or figuring out a crufty forum feels different than 'make friends and become cool enough to get an invite'. This problem becomes more difficult to solve when fandom is less active on other platforms, decreasing the ways you can make friends! Even worse, you can't easily lurk to learn the social norms beforehand.

However, fandom is just bigger now too, which means there are many more public Discords available, from which to splinter off. In some ways, it's a return to requiring active involvement in order to get access, instead of being able to passively consume from the firehose of public twitter/tumblr. It's harder to go track a specific person you think is cool back to their fannish home, but easier to find someone to chat with at all hours of the day. (And lead to friendships and new servers spawned. Ideally.)

I don't know! I don't think Discord is even a good primary fannish platform, but it does seem to be where people are moving, for better or worse. At least I find it more amenable than tumblr, which means I might not disappear until the next migration?
superborb: (Default)
[personal profile] extrapenguin prompted: Thoughts on how fannish platforms/site structure affects fannish expression (e.g. DW vs Twitter)

Read more... )

Back to masterlist
superborb: (Default)
[personal profile] china_shop prompted: Something about AO3?

Just to uh, calibrate expectations: this is an observational ramble, without a thesis.

From my time and experiences in fic fandom, AO3 represents a particularly unique phenomenon: a centralized repository that nearly everyone uses. You might think, oh, but FFN was just as dominant, but no! For at that time, a significant portion of anime fandom resided on private or communal websites; some of those websites may have encapsulated entire canons or ships, or we might count mediaminer, which served as an alternative FFN-like archive for anime fandom. And jpop and kpop fandom was so locked down that I don't think any of it really lived on FFN. Alternatively, you might argue from the other direction: significant portions of fic fandom live on Wattpad or scattered on threadfics on twitter or one offs on tumblr etc etc. True! But the gravity of fic fandom is towards AO3, in a way that no other archive managed /in my experience/.

This has significant upsides: for all the lack of an API, encoding troubles, tagging battles, a centralized interface is so much easier to navigate. You can just reskin everything permanently! You can easily navigate to all the works by an author without having to figure out where their masterlist is, or how they tagged their fics in their LJ. And it's significantly easier for authors to navigate too, having to figure out how to upload once and not fighting html unless they want to.

On the other hand... centralization shoves everyone together and makes it hard to establish norms and boundaries. Having no social media directly attached makes some problems easier (harassment is harder and it's easier to disengage), but some problems harder (really difficult to establish norms when there's no place everyone hangs out hmm). And I say boundaries because it's really clear that different circles of fandom have wildly different norms-- and now we've all been shoved together and those edges are sharp. How much easier would it be to avoid t/b wank if we just had separate websites / comms / mailing lists we hung out on? (Though that's also a tumblr-and-twitter caused problem, not unique to AO3.)

Also we come to the problem with centralization that it makes it hard for alternatives to spring up. If people still regularly posted their fic elsewhere, would those places be more vibrant from the extra foot traffic? Yeah, I know there are AO3 clones running around etc, but would fandom be more flexible from the choices offered? Maybe not, fandom is so big now that it seems that there ought to be enough people who'd try out a new platform and bud off if it offered something better. But are people still interested in trying new ways to post fic? People are dissatisfied with any given social media platform, so move from tumblr to twitter to discord, but every complaint about AO3 and suggestion to 'make something new' tends to be very... AO3 like in structure. Add tags! Add warnings! Change how fandoms are grouped! Get rid of tags!

(OK I am still partial to June's suggestion of getting rid of all stats like things to make AO3 a more pure repository of fic.)

Still, with fandom scattered on social media, it's nice to have one place where people can mingle, such as it is. It used to be (...still is, apparently) that to get on jpop LJ comms, you'd have to submit an essay. With people increasingly turning to more closed social media (private discords, locked twitters) (just in my observation, obviously), AO3 remaining public is nice to serve as a connectivity point between all these different fandom circles, even if it sometimes feels like, once again, you have to submit an essay to join.

Back to masterlist <- Also, there's still space if people want to give prompts! 
superborb: (Default)
Twitter sent me a Twitter anniversary notif recently, it seemed like a good time to reflect on ~returning to fandom~ last year. Also I refuse to read five books in five days, I think my brain may be turning into mush.

Some disconnected thoughts:
1. I always was a little sad that the fandoms I was in were not well documented. I don't know if it was just that the fandoms were smaller (probably for the animanga ones) or more private (...definitely for jpop/kpop which had more locked stuff), but I'd go look at the some long write up in SGA or HP fandom and be-- envious. Part of this is that I have a truly awful memory, reading other people's recollections helps me remember in turn. (I'm great at googling and searching through notes though, so I can pretend!) But also, I think it's the nostalgia for a tiny slice of the internet that few people remember and that is impossible to reconstruct, so much having disappeared over the various LJ deletions and locks.

2. High school me was an idiot, which makes me look on young idiots in fandom with more tolerance. But the resurrection of high school esque clique behavior by adults is so irritating. Sometimes it feels like fandom devotes its time primarily to voyeuristically hating one person, or group, or idea, in order to solidify its in-group dynamics. Then I block on twitter or hide on DW until those things stop appearing and life is better.

3. Speaking of twitter and discord and tumblr, beyond its speed, one thing all the new generation of socmed has in common is the lack of information preservation. Articles on the youth's use of socmed made me realize this is a feature. Perhaps in some ways it's better-- more like natural communication in person. But I love backreading people's journals through tags. I miss that part of it. Tumblr could get the closest to that experience, but it's just not as easy because most people don't curate with that intent.

4. But I don't know if I have a real fandom anymore. Qihun is closest I suppose, tiny fandoms 5ever. But the bulk of my writings are-- food pictures and musings on twitter. Bookblogs and media reviews on DW. Is that still being in fandom? My reading list on DW is mostly book-and-personal, with a handful of fandoms that I'm not fully in. Don't get me wrong, I love book reviews and personal blogs. But I miss meta. Fic still being posted elsewhere and all, meta is what I feel like I lack.

5. I'm so lucky though. It turns out, it wasn't just college causing me to drift away-- it really was that I didn't understand the tumblr experience. (I've gone back to following tumblrs of interest on my RSS reader.) I can enjoy myself on twitter and discord, while keeping a reasonably active DW reading list, and be happy with that balance. It would be hard for me, coming back, if I couldn't use all of those. DW alone wouldn't have been able to feed my fannish feelings in smaller fandoms. It would be hard to make friends on twitter alone, but then it's hard to meet people through discord without an 'in'. (Though I suppose I have met good friends through discord alone.) So for me personally, I'm lucky that I could use all three.

6. I'm so lucky too, for making good friends through fandom once again, after I felt so lonely in the post-grad life. Friends who I disagree with, who challenge me, who clarify my views, who I learn so much from. Friends who are cozy marshmallows of joy. Friends who share this interest of taking something we love and making it more.
superborb: (Default)
1. Diaspora vs Chinese-from-China feelings on culture. Growing up diaspora means living through racism that completely colors the perspective -- it's hard to explain why wearing qipao as a costume is A Problem or cultural appropriation broadly to people who haven't had the experience of it being uncool and othering when you do something and then cool when a white person does it. From someone who grew up in the dominant culture, it just seems like a good thing that people are interested, right?

Anyway, this leads to a feeling (a logical one!) of possessiveness over the tidbits of culture that you can claim for yourself.

2. The nuances of cultural erasure for a canon that was created by the dominant ethnicity and culture of Somewhere Else. As point 1 says, I highly doubt Chinese-from-China would feel as possessive over MDZS/CQL as diaspora fans do. They have many canons that reflect their world; as diaspora, there is relatively few canons that speak to the Chinese diaspora experience. So we attach ourselves to the things we can see a glimmer of ourselves in, in familiar faces, even though we aren't really their target audience.

I personally don't like most modern AUs or really, fic that gets too removed from the Chinese roots of the canon and just /feels/ wrong. It's just not what I enjoy reading. But I'd argue that it's way more erasure to celebrate [insert vaguely often American modern AU here] through its ubiquity and influence on the fandom. I know I fall more on the "this is a transformative works" fandom side of things generally, though I also know that fic and fandom can be deeply racist. But blanket bans on what kind of transformative works are permissive... MDZS/CQL are out there in the world! We can't erase it by any fanworks.

I do fully understand /why/ people are uncomfortable with certain transformations, I just think that in the absence of criticism of transformations that are similar, it leads to point 3.

3. I am so, so, so uncomfortable with anti-Semitism in a world where the alt right is resurging. Adding to the previous tweets I made a while back, characterizing Jews as "greedy," "taking over" are clearly dogwhistles. Please, I beg you, do not. The double standard where Christian AUs don't get backlash? Also seriously anti-Semitic.

As a nonreligious person who grew up in the US, where Christian Chinese are common, I absolutely 100% really do not like Christian AUs. And hey-- I can skip them when they're tagged. The fic getting backlashed was tagged as AU and Jewish from the very beginning.

In conclusion, I don't really want to be ~discourse all the time~ like I feel like I've been recently. I wanted to do two things: a. to push back on the narrative of "you're pushing out diaspora folks!" a bit and b. leave an opening for my ideal, a more nuanced discussion about why certain things feel like erasure and certain things do not. I think it would be revealing.
superborb: (Default)
Recapping and expanding on my thoughts from Erin's recent tweets, I'm actually thinking about how the norms of academic have a point wrt requiring literature review and knowledge of the wider field before contributing, and how that relates to the new norm creation of "credit for everything." Also, worrying about how like-- one of the key parts of grad school is learning those norms and how that serves as a gatekeeping mechanic, if this is going to have a chilling effect on fandom.

There are two discussion points: 1. how fandom memory is so short and having to keep having the same conversations over and over and 2. this new norm of crediting everyone who is involved in the creation of a creative work. (No value judgement on #2 is intended)

Because one of the results of the current infrastructure of fandom makes it hard to do a lit review, to make a longer complete post that people can refer to and discuss, thereby making it harder to be having the same conversation across large swaths of fandom. Having to have the same conversation over and over is exhausting, but like, the audience keeps changing, so is the repetitiveness a net gain or loss?

I'm thinking specifically here about Racefail and its aftereffects, when it's a painful or traumatic topic to keep dredging through. Racefail happened when I was still young enough that the surrounding essays and meta introduced me to many new concepts and is fundamental to how I frame difficult discussions. Without long term fandom memory, when we go over the same arguments again, it'll introduce new people to those concepts.

But at the same time, in academia, we would point people to a review article that summarizes everything, which enables the conversation to be carried forward. We get mired in relitigating the same points because we don't have that fandom memory and it's difficult to link someone to a zillion tweet threads.

However, we don't have this existing norm to cite everything in fandom, and to pretend that it already exists is a bit disingenuous. I'm not going to argue one way or another about if it's good to have an extremely robust citation system, but the way fandom infrastructure is set up, it's hard to do so if this becomes the fandom norm. It also privileges those who do come from academia and have that intrinsic instinct to packrat away references. Lit reviews are hard work!

I am worried that presenting such strict new norms will have a chilling effect where non-diaspora fandom will avoid engaging with diaspora meta or the fandom as a whole because of the ambiguity of if You're Doing It Right. I'm not opposed to a norm change -- as Erin pointed out to me, Plagiarism Is Bad was not actually total fandom consensus it is now before Cassie Clare, and fandom trends are 100% always present in every fandom.
superborb: (Default)
~Inspired~ by the end of year memes, I was curious what my actual AO3 reading history was like. These data were directly scraped from the history page, so they're only as accurate as that. Namely, AO3 only gives you the date you last opened a fic and dynamically updates things like word count; also, some fics I might have opened without reading all the way through etc etc. So pretty fuzzy here.

Some interesting graphs for my own edification:

The number of works that I've read this year looks like a substantial increase over previous years, BUT remember that only the most recent visit "counts," so if I had a long fic that I most recently read in 2020... (I say to myself to make myself feel better.)

Read more... )
superborb: (Default)
As most of you know, I inadvertently hiatused around a decade ago by dint of being unable to make the leap from LJ to tumblr. As a result, when I jumped back in head-first a little over a month ago, I was trying to find people from information left a decade ago. Some folks were curious about what kinds of response rates I got, so here are some (hopefully obscure enough to not erode anyone's privacy) numbers.

Overall, there were 110 individual people who I was friends with on LJ (who still had accounts and hadn't totally deleted in the meantime). Of these, I tried to reach out to 95; the others I didn't feel like I'd been close enough to to justify reaching out or in two sad cases had become very ill or died in the decade preceding.

Overall, I was able to get in contact with 52 people, just over 50%! This was much higher than I expected going in. Of those who responded, 38 were still active in fandom; an additional four (who I could track down to a new fannish home, but didn't respond to my message) were also active in fandom.

The highest response rate came from email or facebook: 17 people out of 22 that I had emails/facebooks for responded. An additional three people were still active on DW. 28 people had left enough forwarding information (or just didn't... change their nyms) that I could find a twitter/tumblr; of these, 23 people responded to my messages. I ended up sending out 42 LJ/DW messages, nine of which had a response.

EDIT: lol omg, 23/28 is a higher percentage than 17/22 please ... ignore that artifact of aggregating the numbers to make them less identifiable. 

Profile

superborb: (Default)
superborb

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 13:22
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios